Predatory Publishing: A Growing Threat to Scholarly Publishing
Main Article Content
Abstract
Publishing in academia is an important aspect of those that are identified with it. Besides teaching and researching, scholars are required to communicate their research through publishing. Consequently, academic publishing has led to the exploitation of the open access publishing model, which in turn has resulted in the influx of predatory publishing. Using a literature review methodology, this article examines Open Access predatory publishing and its impact on scholarly communication. Findings show that predatory publishing is posing an increasing threat to academic credibility and to individual academic reputation. The review further highlights that predatory publishing is not limited to early-career researchers only, but to all authors who are unfamiliar with practices in pseudo journals. By sensitising scholars about the nature of predatory publishing, librarians can support researchers to practice safe publishing.
Article Details
Articles submitted to ZAJLIS should not have been published before in their current or substantially similar form, or be under consideration for publication with another journal. Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed. The editors may make use of software for checking the originality of submissions received.
Prior to article submission, authors should clear permission to use any content that has not been created by them. Failure to do so may lead to lengthy delays in publication. ZAJLIS is unable to publish any article which has permissions pending. The rights ZAJLIS require are:
- Non-exclusive rights to reproduce the material in the article or book chapter.
- Print and electronic rights.
- Worldwide English language rights.
- To use the material for the life of the work (i.e. there should be no time restrictions on the re-use of material e.g. a one-year licence).
References
July 20, 2020, from https://aoasg.org.au/what-is-open-access/
Barroga, E. (2015). Predatory publishing practices corrode the credibility of science.
Journal of Korean Medical Science, 30(10), pp.1535-1536. Retrieved July 20, 2020, from http://synapse.koreamed.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3346%2Fjkms.2015.30.10.1535
Beall, J. (2017). Predatory journals threaten the quality of published medical research. J
Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 47: 3–5.
Bohannon, J. 2013. Who's Afraid of Peer Review? Science 342(6154), pp. 60-
65. DOI: 10.1126/science.342.6154.60. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60/tab-pdf
Bowman, J.D., (2014). Predatory publishing, questionable peer review, and fraudulent
conferences. American journal of pharmaceutical education. Retrieved July 20, 2020, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272078297
Clark, J. (2015). How to avoid predatory journals-a five-point plan. Retrieved July 20,
2020, from http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2015/01/19/jocalyn-clark-how-to-avoid-predatory-journals-a-five-point-plan/
Coan, S. (2017). Predatory journals – A threat to academic credibility. Retrieved July 20,
2020, from https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20170516082327227
Danevska, L. et al., (2016). How to recognize and avoid potential, possible, or probable
predatory open-access publishers, standalone, and hijacked journals. Prilozi, 37(2–3), 5–13. Retrieved December 19, 2019, from Doi: 10.1515/prilozi-2016-0011
Fox, A. & Brainard, J. (2019). The University of California takes a stand on open access.
Science, 363(6431), 1023. Retrieved May 20, 2019 from doi:10.1126/science.363.6431.1023-a
Harboe-Ree, C. (2014). Questionable publishing practices. Retrieved May 10, 2020, from
https://www.monash.edu/data/assets/pdf_file/0009/155952/ul-vanity-publishing.pdf. Last accessed10.05.20
McCabe, B. (2013). Publish or perish: Academic publishing confronts its digital future.
John’s Hopkins Magazine. Retrieved April 11, 2020, from http://hub.jhu.edu/magazine/2013/fall/future-of- academic-publishing.
Moher, D. (2017). Stop this waste of people, animals, and money. Nature, 549(7670),
23-25. Doi: 10.1038/549023a
Nicholl, L. H. & Chinn, P. L. (2015). Caught in the Trap: The Allure of Deceptive
Publishers. Nurse Author & Educator, 25(4), 4. Retrieved July 20, 2020, from http://naepub.com/predatory-publishing/2015-25-4-4/
Oxford University Dictionaries. (2020). Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved
March 6, 2020, from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/academia.
Prater, C. (2014). 8 Ways to Identify a Questionable Open Access Journal. Retrieved
March 6, 2020, from https://www.aje.com/en/author-resources/articles/8-ways-identify-questionable-open-access-journal.
Research4life MOOC. (2020). Think, Check & Submit. Retrieved June 10, 2020, from
https://www.alpsp.org/Think-Check-Submit.
Shen, C. & Björk, B. (2015). Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article
volumes and market characteristics. Retrieved July 20, 2020, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589914/