Predatory Publishing: A Growing Threat to Scholarly Publishing

Main Article Content

Pailet Chewe Eness M. Chitumbo


Publishing in academia is an important aspect of those that are identified with it. Besides teaching and researching, scholars are required to communicate their research through publishing. Consequently, academic publishing has led to the exploitation of the open access publishing model, which in turn has resulted in the influx of predatory publishing. Using a literature review methodology, this article examines Open Access predatory publishing and its impact on scholarly communication. Findings show that predatory publishing is posing an increasing threat to academic credibility and to individual academic reputation. The review further highlights that predatory publishing is not limited to early-career researchers only, but to all authors who are unfamiliar with practices in pseudo journals. By sensitising scholars about the nature of predatory publishing, librarians can support researchers to practice safe publishing.

Article Details

How to Cite
CHEWE, Pailet; CHITUMBO, Eness M.. Predatory Publishing:. Zambia Journal of Library & Information Science (ZAJLIS ), ISSN: 2708-2695, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 2, p. 1-10, dec. 2020. ISSN 2708-2695. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 11 apr. 2021.
Open Access Publishing


Australasian Open Access Strategy Group. (2016). What is Open Access? Retrieved
July 20, 2020, from
Barroga, E. (2015). Predatory publishing practices corrode the credibility of science.
Journal of Korean Medical Science, 30(10), pp.1535-1536. Retrieved July 20, 2020, from
Beall, J. (2017). Predatory journals threaten the quality of published medical research. J
Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 47: 3–5.
Bohannon, J. 2013. Who's Afraid of Peer Review? Science 342(6154), pp. 60-
65. DOI: 10.1126/science.342.6154.60.
Bowman, J.D., (2014). Predatory publishing, questionable peer review, and fraudulent
conferences. American journal of pharmaceutical education. Retrieved July 20, 2020, from
Clark, J. (2015). How to avoid predatory journals-a five-point plan. Retrieved July 20,
2020, from
Coan, S. (2017). Predatory journals – A threat to academic credibility. Retrieved July 20,
2020, from
Danevska, L. et al., (2016). How to recognize and avoid potential, possible, or probable
predatory open-access publishers, standalone, and hijacked journals. Prilozi, 37(2–3), 5–13. Retrieved December 19, 2019, from Doi: 10.1515/prilozi-2016-0011
Fox, A. & Brainard, J. (2019). The University of California takes a stand on open access.
Science, 363(6431), 1023. Retrieved May 20, 2019 from doi:10.1126/science.363.6431.1023-a
Harboe-Ree, C. (2014). Questionable publishing practices. Retrieved May 10, 2020, from Last accessed10.05.20
McCabe, B. (2013). Publish or perish: Academic publishing confronts its digital future.
John’s Hopkins Magazine. Retrieved April 11, 2020, from academic-publishing.
Moher, D. (2017). Stop this waste of people, animals, and money. Nature, 549(7670),
23-25. Doi: 10.1038/549023a
Nicholl, L. H. & Chinn, P. L. (2015). Caught in the Trap: The Allure of Deceptive
Publishers. Nurse Author & Educator, 25(4), 4. Retrieved July 20, 2020, from
Oxford University Dictionaries. (2020). Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved
March 6, 2020, from
Prater, C. (2014). 8 Ways to Identify a Questionable Open Access Journal. Retrieved
March 6, 2020, from
Research4life MOOC. (2020). Think, Check & Submit. Retrieved June 10, 2020, from
Shen, C. & Björk, B. (2015). Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article
volumes and market characteristics. Retrieved July 20, 2020, from